From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Phigenix, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California
Jun 30, 2015
C 15-01238 BLF (N.D. Cal. Jun. 30, 2015)

Opinion

          Robert A. Gutkin, ANDREWS KURTH LLP, Washington, DC, Edward Vincent King, Jr., KING & KELLEHER, LLP, San Francisco, CA, PHIGENIX, INC. Attorneys for Plaintiff,


          NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL DAVID CHRISTOPHER HANSON AND ORDER PERMITTING WITHDRAWAL

          BETH LABSON FREEMAN, District Judge.

         TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

         PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to Local Rule 11-5, David Christopher Hanson is hereby withdrawn as attorney of record for Plaintiff PHIGENIX, INC. in this action. The ground for withdrawal is that the above-captioned case has been transferred from the Northern District of Georgia to the Northern District of California, and Mr. Hanson's firm, Weathington Smith, P.C. (Atlanta, GA), will no longer represent Plaintiff as local counsel. Counsel of record for Plaintiff otherwise remains the same.

         SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Phigenix, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California
Jun 30, 2015
C 15-01238 BLF (N.D. Cal. Jun. 30, 2015)
Case details for

Phigenix, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:PHIGENIX, INC., Plaintiff, v. GENENTECH, INC., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California

Date published: Jun 30, 2015

Citations

C 15-01238 BLF (N.D. Cal. Jun. 30, 2015)