From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pheth v. Andrewjeski

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Feb 13, 2023
C22-1266 BHS (W.D. Wash. Feb. 13, 2023)

Opinion

C22-1266 BHS

02-13-2023

HACH PHETH, Petitioner, v. MELISSA ANDREWJESKI, Respondent.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

BENJAMIN H. SETTLE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This matter comes before the Court on Magistrate Judge Michelle L. Peterson's Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) recommending that this Court deny Petitioner Hach Pheth's 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition and dismiss this case with prejudice, Dkt. 9. Specifically, Judge Peterson recommends denying Pheth's petition because he failed to exhaust all his claims in state court and because the one claim that could be considered exhausted fails on the merits. Id. She further recommends that the Court deny Pheth a certificate of appealability. Id. The Court, having considered the R&R and the remaining record and no objections having been filed, does hereby order as follows:

(1) The R&R is ADOPTED;

(2) Petitioner's petition for habeas corpus, Dkt. 4, is DENIED and this action

(3) A certificate of appealability is DENIED as to all claims; and

(4) The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order to the parties and Judge Peterson.


Summaries of

Pheth v. Andrewjeski

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Feb 13, 2023
C22-1266 BHS (W.D. Wash. Feb. 13, 2023)
Case details for

Pheth v. Andrewjeski

Case Details

Full title:HACH PHETH, Petitioner, v. MELISSA ANDREWJESKI, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Feb 13, 2023

Citations

C22-1266 BHS (W.D. Wash. Feb. 13, 2023)