Phelps v. Winn

Full title: COY PHELPS, Plaintiff v. DAVID WINN, et al., Defendants

Court: United States District Court, D. Massachusetts

Date published: Mar 28, 2007

CIVIL ACTION NO. 05-40003-GAO (D. Mass. Mar. 28, 2007)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 05-40003-GAO.

March 28, 2007

ORDER

GEORGE O'TOOLE JR., District Judge

This order resolves the following pending motions:

• Motion to Amend the Complaint (dkt. no. 19) — DENIED as this is the second proposed amendment, which was filed after the defendants' Motion to Dismiss was filed, and the plaintiff offers no justification for the late proffer.

• Motion to Take Judicial Notice (dkt. no. 20) — DENIED

• Motion to Submit New Information on the Above Case (dkt. no. 23) — DENIED

• Motion to Appoint Counsel — (dkt. no. 29) — DENIED

• Motion to Bifurcate (dkt. no. 30) — DENIED

• Motion to Attend Hearings via Telephone or Video Conference (dkt. no. 31) — DENIED without prejudice as no hearings are scheduled at this time.

It is SO ORDERED.