From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Phelps v. Boy Scouts of America

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 4, 2000
268 A.D.2d 210 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

January 4, 2000

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Jerry Crispino, J.), entered November 18, 1998, which, in an action to recover for personal injuries allegedly sustained as a result of defendants' negligence in preventing an assault, denied defendants-appellants' motion for a severance, and for a change of venue of the severed causes of action to New York County, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Michael S. Feldman, for plaintiffs-respondents.

Brian P. Morrisey, for defendants-appellants.

ROSENBERGER, J.P., WILLIAMS, LERNER, SAXE, BUCKLEY, JJ.


A severance of the claims asserted by the plaintiffs who reside in New York County from that of the claim asserted by the plaintiff who resides in Bronx County is sought on the ground that the injuries sustained by the Bronx plaintiff is substantially more severe than those sustained by the New York plaintiffs. Such a severance was properly denied because the various claims all arose out of the same occurrence and defendants fail to show how convenience would be furthered or prejudice avoided (CPLR 603 ;see, Sichel v. Community Synagogue, 256 A.D.2d 276). We find no fault with the venue determination of the IAS court.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Phelps v. Boy Scouts of America

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 4, 2000
268 A.D.2d 210 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Phelps v. Boy Scouts of America

Case Details

Full title:VINCENT PHELPS, etc., et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. BOY SCOUTS OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 4, 2000

Citations

268 A.D.2d 210 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
700 N.Y.S.2d 461

Citing Cases

Lester v. JD Carlisle Dev. Corp.

The parties would be forced to hold two trials on the same facts. Because both the Labor Law §§ 241 (6) and…