holding that individuals who are currently serving probation terms are "in custody"
Summary of this case from Ausbie v. Bakersfield Mun. CourtNo. 88-1698.
October 2, 1989.
C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 865 F. 2d 1539.
holding that individuals who are currently serving probation terms are "in custody"
Summary of this case from Ausbie v. Bakersfield Mun. Courtholding that individuals who are currently serving probation terms are "in custody"
Summary of this case from Ausbie v. Merickelfinding joint action established by common mission between private employer and local law enforcement officers to violate striker's rights
Summary of this case from Aldana v. Fresh Del Monte Producefinding joint action established by common mission between private employer and local law enforcement officers to violate striker's rights
Summary of this case from Aldana v. Fresh Del Monte Produce, Inc.Full title:PHELPS DODGE CORP. v. UNITED STEELWORKERS OF AMERICA ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Oct 2, 1989
A “ ‘ scintilla of evidence,’ or evidence that is ‘merely colorable’ or ‘not significantly probative,’ ” does…
Ziniker v. WaldoLEGAL STANDARDS FRCP 56(c) authorizes summary judgment if "no genuine issue" exists regarding any material…