From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Phea v. Pfeiffer

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 24, 2021
2:20-cv-00283 WBS GGH P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 24, 2021)

Opinion

2:20-cv-00283 WBS GGH P

11-24-2021

MALANJE PHEA, Petitioner, v. CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER

WILLIAM B. SHUBB UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On October 22, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 74. Petitioner has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. ECF No. 75.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed October 22, 2021, are adopted in full; and

2. Petitioner's amended motion for relief from judgment (ECF No. 73) is denied.


Summaries of

Phea v. Pfeiffer

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 24, 2021
2:20-cv-00283 WBS GGH P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 24, 2021)
Case details for

Phea v. Pfeiffer

Case Details

Full title:MALANJE PHEA, Petitioner, v. CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER, Warden, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Nov 24, 2021

Citations

2:20-cv-00283 WBS GGH P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 24, 2021)