From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

P.H.C. Inc. v. Wolf

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 28, 1968
30 A.D.2d 980 (N.Y. App. Div. 1968)

Opinion

October 28, 1968


Appeal by plaintiff from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated May 27, 1968, as denied its motion for a protective order. Order modified, on the law and in the exercise of discretion, by adding item 7 to the first ordering paragraph. As so modified, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $10 costs and disbursements to respondents. The discovery and inspection shall proceed at the place directed in the order under review at a time to be specified in a written notice of not less than 10 days or at such other time and place as may be agreed by the parties. In our opinion, the documents sought to be discovered in item 7 of the notice to produce are not specified with reasonable particularity (CPLR 3120; Haftel v. Appleton, 21 A.D.2d 651; Rios v. Donovan, 21 A.D.2d 409, 414). Christ, Acting P.J., Brennan, Benjamin, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

P.H.C. Inc. v. Wolf

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 28, 1968
30 A.D.2d 980 (N.Y. App. Div. 1968)
Case details for

P.H.C. Inc. v. Wolf

Case Details

Full title:P.H.C. INC., Appellant, v. HASKELL WOLF et al., Doing Business under the…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 28, 1968

Citations

30 A.D.2d 980 (N.Y. App. Div. 1968)

Citing Cases

Quirino v. N.Y. City Tr. Auth

In the case of discovery and inspection, the rule itself requires that a notice must be served in which the…