Opinion
24-cv-11324
08-29-2024
ORDER STRIKING DOCUMENT (DKT. 20)
MARK A. GOLDSMITH, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
The Court has reviewed the following document: motion to permit second amended complaint (Dkt. 20). The Court finds that it should be stricken for the following reason(s):
[ ] Missing or insufficient statement of non-concurrence. See LR 7.1(a).
[ ] Over-length. See LR 7.1(d)(3).
[ ] Wrong font size. See LR 5.1(a)(3).
[ ] Missing required information (e.g., concise statement of issues, controlling or most appropriate authority, etc.). See LR 7.1(d)(2).
[ ] Improperly formatted (e.g., single-spaced, improper margins, missing page numbers, etc.). See LR 5.1(a)(2).
[ ] Does not comply with the Case Management Order in this case for the following reasons:___
[√] . Filing does not comply with Court's order regarding protocols on filings and communication with Court (Dkt. 18)
Accordingly, the Court strikes the document. Plaintiff shall file a corrected document that complies with all requirements on or before September 4, 2024
SO ORDERED.