From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

PGM of Tex. v. Great Glory Cores, Inc.

United States District Court, W.D. Texas, Austin Division
Sep 23, 2024
1:23-CV-709-RP (W.D. Tex. Sep. 23, 2024)

Opinion

1:23-CV-709-RP

09-23-2024

PGM OF TEXAS, LLC, Plaintiff, v. GREAT GLORY CORES, INC., et al., Defendants.


ORDER

ROBERT PITMAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

Before the Court is the report and recommendation from United States Magistrate Judge Susan Hightower concerning Defendants' Second Amended Motion for Default Judgment, (Dkt. 25). (R. & R., Dkt. 26). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Rule 1(d) of Appendix C of the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, Judge Hightower issued her report and recommendation on August 30, 2024. (Id.). As of the date of this order, no party has filed objections to the report and recommendation.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), a party may serve and file specific, written objections to a magistrate judge's proposed findings and recommendations within fourteen days after being served with a copy of the report and recommendation and, in doing so, secure de novo review by the district court. When no objections are timely filed, a district court can review the magistrate's report and recommendation for clear error. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 72 advisory committee's note (“When no timely objection is filed, the [district] court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.”).

Because no party has filed timely objections, the Court reviews the report and recommendation for clear error. Having done so and finding no clear error, the Court accepts and adopts the report and recommendation as its own order.

Accordingly, the Court ORDERS that the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, (Dkt. 26), is ADOPTED. Defendants' second amended motion for default judgment, (Dkt. 25), is GRANTED. IT IS ORDERED that default judgment is entered against each Defendant under Rule 55(b). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that PGM shall be awarded $686,891.76 in damages, $13,481 in attorneys' fees, $402 in costs, and pre-judgment and postjudgment interest.

The Court will enter final judgment by separate order.


Summaries of

PGM of Tex. v. Great Glory Cores, Inc.

United States District Court, W.D. Texas, Austin Division
Sep 23, 2024
1:23-CV-709-RP (W.D. Tex. Sep. 23, 2024)
Case details for

PGM of Tex. v. Great Glory Cores, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:PGM OF TEXAS, LLC, Plaintiff, v. GREAT GLORY CORES, INC., et al.…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Texas, Austin Division

Date published: Sep 23, 2024

Citations

1:23-CV-709-RP (W.D. Tex. Sep. 23, 2024)