From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pfeffer v. McBride

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jul 17, 2007
241 F. App'x 910 (4th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

No. 07-6296.

Submitted: July 9, 2007.

Decided: July 17, 2007.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Robert C. Chambers, District Judge. (2:06-cv-00030).

Anthony Pfeffer, Appellant Pro Se. Robert David Goldberg, Office of the Attorney General of West Virginia, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Vacated and remanded by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Anthony Pfeffer appeals the district court's January 5, 2007 order granting him in forma pauperis status on his appeal of the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition, but applying the filing fee provisions of the Prisoner Litigation Reform Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (2000), to Pfeffer's appeal. Subsequently, the district court entered an order on February 16, 2007, in which it granted in forma pauperis status but did not require Pfeffer to pay a filing fee to prosecute his appeal. We grant Pfeffer in forma pauperis status in his underlying appeal and vacate the district court's January 5, 2007 order. We remand with instructions that any fee collected pursuant to the January 5, 2007 order be refunded to Pfeffer. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

VACATED AND REMANDED.


Summaries of

Pfeffer v. McBride

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jul 17, 2007
241 F. App'x 910 (4th Cir. 2007)
Case details for

Pfeffer v. McBride

Case Details

Full title:Anthony PFEFFER, Petitioner — Appellant, v. Thomas McBRIDE, Warden, Mount…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jul 17, 2007

Citations

241 F. App'x 910 (4th Cir. 2007)

Citing Cases

Samarripa v. Ormond

We recognize that each circuit to address the issue has said that the PLRA does not apply to habeas appeals.…