Opinion
Argued June 25, 1888
Decided October 2, 1888
John Van Voorhis for appellants.
Theodore Bacon for respondent.
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Pfaudler Barm Extracting Bunging Apparatus Co. v. Sargent
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 2, 1888
110 N.Y. 657 (N.Y. 1888)
Summaries of
Pfaudler Barm Extracting Bunging Apparatus Co. v. Sargent
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 2, 1888
110 N.Y. 657 (N.Y. 1888)
Case details for
Pfaudler Barm Extracting Bunging Apparatus Co. v. Sargent
Case Details
Full title:PFAUDLER BARM EXTRACTING BUNGING APPARATUS COMPANY, Respondent, v . JAMES…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Oct 2, 1888
Citations
110 N.Y. 657 (N.Y. 1888)
18 N.Y. St. Rptr. 1025
18 N.E. 479
Citing Cases
Hudson v. Erie R.R. Co.
5. The clerk disallowed the sum of $152 paid by the plaintiff for stenographer's fees. There are decisions to…
Bell v. ThompsonTherefore, appellant is estopped from further litigating a question involved in such appeal. ( Van Rensselaer…