From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peyton v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Oct 6, 1928
270 P. 860 (Okla. Crim. App. 1928)

Opinion

No. A-6350.

Opinion Filed October 6, 1928.

(Syllabus.)

Appeal and Error — Time for Appeal in Felony Case. In felony cases the appeal must be taken within six months after the judgment is rendered. Where an appeal in a felony case is not lodged in this court within the six months' period from the date the judgment is rendered, this court acquires no jurisdiction, and the attempted appeal will be dismissed.

Appeal from District Court, Oklahoma County; William H. Zwick, Judge.

Ernest Peyton was convicted of robbery, and he appeals. Appeal dismissed, and cause remanded with directions.

John J. Carney, L.W. Harrod, J.Q.A. Harrod, and Lee Gill, for plaintiff in error.

Edwin Dabney, Atty. Gen., and J.H. Lawson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.


The plaintiff in error was convicted in the district court of Oklahoma county on a charge of robbery and was sentenced to serve a term of five years in the state penitentiary. The state has filed a motion to dismiss for the reason that the appeal was not filed within six months from the date of the rendering of the judgment. The judgment in this case was rendered on February 15, 1926. The petition in error was filed on Tuesday, August 17, 1926, more than six months from the date the judgment was rendered. Section 2808, Comp. St. 1921, in part reads: "* * * In felony cases the appeal must be taken within six months after the judgment is rendered. * * *"

The statute fixes the time for appeal and this court is without power to extend the terms of the statute, and when, as in this case, the appeal is filed after the expiration of the six months' period, this court does not acquire jurisdiction, but must dismiss the appeal. Howey v. State, 9 Okla. Cr. 453, 132 P. 499; Dunn v. State, 18 Okla. Cr. 493, 196 P. 739; George v. State, 21 Okla. Cr. 240, 205 P. 942; Heath v. State, 22 Okla. Cr. 122, 210 P. 560; Criner v. State, 37 Okla. Cr. 313, 258 P. 359; Easterwood v. State, 38 Okla. Cr. 72, 259 P. 181.

The attempted appeal is dismissed and the cause remanded to the district court, with instructions to enforce the judgment.

DOYLE, P.J., and DAVENPORT, J., concur.


Summaries of

Peyton v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Oct 6, 1928
270 P. 860 (Okla. Crim. App. 1928)
Case details for

Peyton v. State

Case Details

Full title:ERNEST PEYTON v. STATE

Court:Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma

Date published: Oct 6, 1928

Citations

270 P. 860 (Okla. Crim. App. 1928)
270 P. 860

Citing Cases

White v. State

The time for appeal is fixed by statute. This court is without power to extend the time for appeal, and when,…

Rogers v. State

The statute fixes the time for appeal. This court is without power to extend the terms of the statute. When,…