Peysina v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co.

Full title: Natalia PEYSINA, Appellant, v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, etc.…

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Date published: May 14, 2014

138 So. 3d 1137 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

Opinion

No. 3D14–8.

2014-05-14

Natalia PEYSINA, Appellant, v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, etc., Appellee.

An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami–Dade County, David C. Miller, Judge. Parrish & Yarnell, P.A., and Jon D. Parrish (Naples), for appellant. Morris, Laing, Evans, Brock & Kennedy, CHTD, and Jeremy W. Harris, Khari E. Taustin, Masimba M. Matumba, and Angela Barbosa Wilborn (West Palm Beach), for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami–Dade County, David C. Miller, Judge.

Parrish & Yarnell, P.A., and Jon D. Parrish (Naples), for appellant. Morris, Laing, Evans, Brock & Kennedy, CHTD, and Jeremy W. Harris, Khari E. Taustin, Masimba M. Matumba, and Angela Barbosa Wilborn (West Palm Beach), for appellee.
Before WELLS, LAGOA, and LOGUE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm because competent, substantial evidence supports the trial court's finding that Deutsche Bank National Trust Company conducted an adequate search to locate Natalia Peysina prior to constructive service. See generally Giron v. Ugly Mortg., Inc., 935 So.2d 580, 582 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) (“If there is a challenge to constructive service, the trial court has the duty of determining ... whether the plaintiff conducted an adequate search to locate the defendants. Our standard of review determines whether there was competent substantial evidence to support the decision of the trial judge.”) (internal citation omitted).