Peyser v. Searle Blatt Co.

Full title: STEPHEN PEYSER d/b/a ONE BY DIANA, DIANE MOSS, Plaintiffs, v. SEARLE BLATT…

Court: United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Sep 6, 2002

99 Civ. 10785 (WK) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 6, 2002)

Opinion

99 Civ. 10785 (WK).

September 6, 2002

For Plaintiffs, Stephen Peyser, Diane Moss, One By Diana, (pro se), New York, NY.

For Defendants Carol Horn, E.N.K. Productions Ltd., and former Defendants Searle Blatt Co., Ltd., Steve Searle, and Alice Blatt Searle: Robert P. Lynn, Jr., John W. Dunne, Law Office of Robert P. Lynn, Jr., LLC, Mineola, NY.

For Defendants Roni Rabl, Inc. and Neiman-Marcus Group, Inc.: Joel K. Bohmart, Bohmart Sacks, P.C., New York, NY.

ORDER

WHITMAN KNAPP, Senior District Judge.

The Plaintiffs request an extension of time in which to file a "response" to our July 23, 2002 order. On August 1, 2002, we granted the Plaintiffs' previous request for such an extension and indicated that no further extensions of time for such a "response" would be granted. Nonetheless, for good cause shown under the circumstances, we hereby GRANT the Plaintiffs' request for a second extension. The Plaintiffs may file the foregoing "response" on or before October 11, 2002. Nevertheless, the Plaintiffs should bear in mind that, unless they can demonstrate good cause, no further extensions of time will be granted.

SO ORDERED.