Petzold v. Petzold

Full title: CHARLES B. PETZOLD, Appellant, v. LAURETTE PETZOLD, Respondent

Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1999

259 A.D.2d 474 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

684 N.Y.S.2d 888

Opinion

March 1, 1999

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Shapiro, J.).

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate a change of circumstances sufficient to entitle him to a downward modification of his child support obligation ( see, Matter of Mendelson v. Winter, 255 A.D.2d 327; see also, Hickland v. Hickland, 39 N.Y.2d 1, cert denied 429 U.S. 941; Matter of Ludwig v. Reyome, 195 A.D.2d 1020; Matter of Moore v. Moore, 115 A.D.2d 894).

Miller, J. P., Sullivan, Friedmann and Luciano, JJ., concur.