From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Petzilla, Inc. v. Anser Innovation LLC

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Francisco Division
Aug 25, 2014
3:14-cv-01354-EMC (N.D. Cal. Aug. 25, 2014)

Opinion

          NICOLAS S. GIKKAS, THE GIKKAS LAW FIRM, Palo Alto, California, KIEUN SUNG-IKEGAMI, JON IKEGAMI, INNOVATION COUNSEL LLP, Santa Clara, California, Attorneys for Plaintiff, PETZILLA, INC.

          MICHAEL F. HEAFEY, GEORGE R. MORRIS, King & Spalding LLP, Palo Alto, CA, GRANT D. FAIRBAIRN (admitted pro hac vice), Fredrikson Byron, P.A., Attorneys for Defendant, ANSER INNOVATION LLC.


          STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF THE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE PURSUANT TO LOCAL CIVIL RULES 6-2(A) AND 7-12

          EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.

         Plaintiff Petzilla, Inc. ("Petzilla") and Defendant Anser Innovation LLC ("Anser") file this stipulation pursuant to Local Civil Rules 6-2 and 7-12 to request that the Court enter an order continuing the initial Case Management Conference ("CMC") (currently set for September 4, 2014, see Dkt. No. 30) until October 9, 2014. The parties likewise request an order extending the deadline for the joint case management conference statement (currently set for August 28, 2014) until October 2, 2014.

         The parties make this request to allow the Court time to consider Anser's pending Motion Pursuant To Rule 12(b)(2) To Dismiss For Lack Of Personal Jurisdiction ("Motion to Dismiss") (Dkt. No. 34) before engaging in scheduling issues. The hearing on Anser's Motion to Dismiss is set for August 28, 2014, which is the current deadline for the joint case management conference statement and one week before the initial CMC. The parties agree that, under the circumstances of this case, it is appropriate to postpone the CMC by one month. If the Court grants the Motion, this case will end and there will be no need for the CMC. If the Court denies the Motion, the CMC will occur only one month later than currently scheduled.

         The Court previously continued the CMC from June 19, 2014 to September 4, 2014. (Dkt. No. 30.) At the time of that continuance, however, the parties had not yet agreed on a hearing date for the Motion to Dismiss. Now that the hearing on the Motion is set for August 28, 2014, the parties agree that the most efficient course is to further continue the initial CMC. The parties have not yet had any discussions toward developing a schedule, and the requested time modification will not impact the schedule for the case because there are no other pending deadlines beyond those related to the CMC.

         For the foregoing reasons, Petzilla and Anser request an order continuing the initial CMC until October 9, 2014 and the deadline for the joint case management conference statement until October 2, 2014.

         IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.

         PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Petzilla, Inc. v. Anser Innovation LLC

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Francisco Division
Aug 25, 2014
3:14-cv-01354-EMC (N.D. Cal. Aug. 25, 2014)
Case details for

Petzilla, Inc. v. Anser Innovation LLC

Case Details

Full title:PETZILLA, INC. a Delaware Corporation, d/b/a Petzila Plaintiff, v. ANSER…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Francisco Division

Date published: Aug 25, 2014

Citations

3:14-cv-01354-EMC (N.D. Cal. Aug. 25, 2014)