From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Petty v. Shojaei

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 31, 2013
Case No. EDCV 12-1220 JAK (SS) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 31, 2013)

Summary

noting that telling prison staff of a medical need was sufficient to allege the subjective component of an Eighth Amendment claim

Summary of this case from McClure v. Chen

Opinion

Case No. EDCV 12-1220 JAK (SS)

10-31-2013

KEITH M. PETTY, Plaintiff, v. PA-C SHOJAEI, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS,

CONCLUSIONS, AND

RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED

STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, Plaintiff's Opposition, all the records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The time for filing Objections has passed, and no Objections have been received. Accordingly, the Court accepts and adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation.

Consistent with the Report and Recommendation, IT IS ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Specifically,

(1) Defendants' Motion to Dismiss on the ground of Plaintiff's alleged failure to exhaust administrative remedies is DENIED without prejudice;
(2) Defendants' Motion to Dismiss on the ground of failure to state a claim for deliberate indifference is DENIED;
(3) Defendant Blier's Motion to Dismiss on the ground of qualified immunity is DENIED without prejudice;
(4) Defendants' Motion to Dismiss on the ground of Plaintiff's failure to serve Defendants Shojaei, Almond and Chaney in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) is DENIED without prejudice;
(5) Defendants' Motion to Dismiss on the ground of failure to state a claim against Defendants in their official capacity is GRANTED;
(6) Defendant Aird's Motion to Dismiss on the ground of absolute immunity under 42 U.S.C. § 233(a) is GRANTED.

Defendant Blier is ORDERED to file an Answer to the First Amended Complaint, as amended by the dismissal with prejudice of all claims against all Defendants in their official capacity and all claims against Defendant Aird in both his individual and official capacities, within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order.

The Clerk of the Court shall serve copies of this Order on Plaintiff and counsel for Defendants.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

__________________________

JOHN A. KRONSTADT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Petty v. Shojaei

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 31, 2013
Case No. EDCV 12-1220 JAK (SS) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 31, 2013)

noting that telling prison staff of a medical need was sufficient to allege the subjective component of an Eighth Amendment claim

Summary of this case from McClure v. Chen
Case details for

Petty v. Shojaei

Case Details

Full title:KEITH M. PETTY, Plaintiff, v. PA-C SHOJAEI, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 31, 2013

Citations

Case No. EDCV 12-1220 JAK (SS) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 31, 2013)

Citing Cases

Ou-Young v. Roberts

A claim of entitlement to absolute immunity can be brought as a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(1). See…

Messer v. Mettry

A negligence or tort claim is not a basis for relief under Bivens. Petty v. Shojaei, 2013 WL 5890136, * 3, n.…