Petty v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Full title: Ronald L. Petty & Sondra L. Petty Petitioners v. Commissioner of Internal…

Court: United States Tax Court

Date published: Mar 25, 2022

No. 32852-21 (U.S.T.C. Mar. 25, 2022)

Opinion

32852-21

03-25-2022

Ronald L. Petty & Sondra L. Petty Petitioners v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Respondent

Maurice B. Foley Chief Judge.

ORDER

Maurice B. Foley Chief Judge.

The Petition filed to commence this case served on December 7, 2021, was not properly executed in that it did not bear the original signatures of petitioners or of a practitioner admitted and recognized to practice before the Tax Court, as required by the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure. It also appears that petitioners' non-attorney representative who is not admitted to practice before this Court signed the petition. The United States Tax Court, which is separate and independent from the IRS, has certain requirements that must be met before an individual can be recognized as representing petitioners before the Court. The Court has prepared Q&A's on the subject "Representing a Taxpayer Before the U.S. Tax Court. A copy of these Q&A's are attached to this order. The Court also encourages practitioners and non-attorneys seeking admission to practice before the Court to consult "Guidance for Practitioners" on the Court's website atwww.ustaxcourt.gov/practitioners.html. At this juncture, Marilyn S. Bishop will not be associated with this case and we encourage petitioners' representative to review the Court's admissions requirements.

Therefore, in order for this Court potentially to acquire jurisdiction to consider this case, it is necessary to obtain a Ratification of Petition bearing petitioners' original signatures and ratifying the petition previously filed. Upon due consideration and for cause, it is

ORDERED that, on or before May 24, 2022, petitioners shall file with the Court in paper form a Ratification of Petition ratifying and affirming the filing of the Petition on their behalf (preferably in "wet ink" signature, not a photocopied signature). Petitioners should note that the ratification of petition may not be electronically filed. It is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to attach to this Order a form that petitioners may use to comply with this Order. It is further

ORDERED that, in addition to regular service, the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Order on Marilyn S. Bishop at the address which is listed for her on the petition. 1