From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pettus v. Hubert

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Nov 28, 2017
155 A.D.3d 552 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

11-28-2017

In re James PETTUS, Petitioner, v. Hon. James W. HUBERT, Respondent.

James Pettus, petitioner pro se. John W. McConnell, New York (Shawn Kerby of counsel), for respondent.


James Pettus, petitioner pro se.

John W. McConnell, New York (Shawn Kerby of counsel), for respondent.

The above-named petitioner having presented an application to this Court praying for an order, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules,

Now, upon reading and filing the papers in said proceeding, and due deliberation having been had thereon,

It is unanimously ordered that the application be and the same hereby is denied and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

RICHTER, J.P., KAPNICK, WEBBER, OING, SINGH, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Pettus v. Hubert

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Nov 28, 2017
155 A.D.3d 552 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

Pettus v. Hubert

Case Details

Full title:In re James PETTUS, Petitioner, v. Hon. James W. HUBERT, Respondent.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 28, 2017

Citations

155 A.D.3d 552 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
64 N.Y.S.3d 544