Summary
In Pettit v. Pettit the parties had separated and an action for a limited divorce was pending when they entered into an agreement that provided for the wife's support through a division of the husband's property, which was to be converted into money, and after payment of his debts one-third of the remainder paid over to her. An examination of the record in that case, as it appears on our files, shows that the contract was directly between husband and wife, without the intervention of a trustee.
Summary of this case from Winter v. WinterOpinion
Argued December 5, 1887
Decided December 20, 1887
Josiah T. Marean for appellant.
G. Storms Carpenter for respondent.
FINCH, J., reads for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.