Pettigrew v. State

16 Citing cases

  1. Hill v. State

    2024 Ark. App. 385 (Ark. Ct. App. 2024)   Cited 1 times

    A no-merit brief in a criminal case that fails to address an adverse ruling does not satisfy the requirements of Rule 4-3(b)(1), and rebriefing is required. Pettigrew v. State, 2019 Ark.App. 336; Liddell v. State, 2015 Ark.App. 172; Swarthout v. State, 2012 Ark.App. 46.

  2. Page v. State

    2024 Ark. App. 28 (Ark. Ct. App. 2024)   Cited 1 times

    A no-merit brief in a criminal case that fails to address an adverse ruling does not satisfy the requirements of Rule 4-3(b)(1), and rebriefing is required. Pettigrew v. State, 2019 Ark.App. 336. This court has held that denials of requests for sentences of probation, requests for transfer to drug court or veterans-treatment court, and requests that sentencing be deferred to a later date are all adverse rulings that must be addressed. See Marshall v. State, 2021 Ark.App. 283; Liddell v. State, 2015 Ark.App. 172; Swarthout v. State, 2012 Ark.App. 46.

  3. Edwards v. State

    2024 Ark. App. 27 (Ark. Ct. App. 2024)   Cited 3 times

    A no-merit brief in a criminal case that fails to address an adverse ruling does not satisfy the requirements of Rule 4-3(b)(1), and rebriefing is required. Pettigrew v. State, 2019 Ark.App. 336. This court has held that denials of requests for specific dispositions, such as an additional sentence of probation, transfer to drug court or veterans-treatment court, and requests that sentencing be deferred to a later date are all adverse rulings that must be addressed.

  4. Stephenson v. State

    2023 Ark. App. 453 (Ark. Ct. App. 2023)   Cited 3 times

    Counsel's failure to explain why the above-referenced adverse rulings would not be meritorious grounds for reversal on appeal require rebriefing. See Pettigrew v. State, 2019 Ark.App. 336 (rebriefing ordered because counsel did not address the circuit court's failure to grant defendant's request for reinstatement of his probation or drug court).

  5. Moore v. State

    2022 Ark. App. 5 (Ark. Ct. App. 2022)   Cited 10 times

    A no-merit brief in a criminal case that fails to address an adverse ruling does not satisfy the requirements of Rule 4-3(k)(1), and rebriefing will be required. Pettigrew v. State, 2019 Ark.App. 336. This court has held that denials of requests for sentences of probation, requests for transfer to drug court or veterans treatment court, and requests that sentencing be deferred to a later date are all adverse rulings that must be addressed.

  6. Shinn v. State

    2021 Ark. App. 313 (Ark. Ct. App. 2021)   Cited 1 times

    In Joyner v. State, 2021 Ark.App. 11, we denied counsel's motion to be relieved and ordered rebriefing when counsel failed to address the circuit court's denial of appellant's request during her testimony to send her to rehab rather than to prison. Similarly, in Pettigrew v. State, 2019 Ark.App. 336, we ordered rebriefing when counsel did not address the circuit court's failure to grant the appellant's request for reinstatement of his probation or for drug court. Likewise, here, counsel has failed to explain why the circuit court's rejection of Shinn's request to be sent to rehab would not be a meritorious ground for reversal.

  7. Marshall v. State

    2021 Ark. App. 283 (Ark. Ct. App. 2021)   Cited 4 times

    A no-merit brief in a criminal case that fails to address an adverse ruling does not satisfy the requirements of Rule 4-3(k)(1), and rebriefing will be required. Pettigrew v. State, 2019 Ark.App. 336. This court has held that denials of requests for sentences of probation, requests for transfer to drug court or veterans treatment court, and requests that sentencing be deferred to a later date are all adverse rulings that must be addressed.

  8. Welborn v. State

    2021 Ark. App. 90 (Ark. Ct. App. 2021)   Cited 2 times

    Accordingly, rebriefing is required. See, e.g., Pettigrew v. State, 2019 Ark. App. 336. Rebriefing is additionally required for a point that this court would like counsel to develop more fully.

  9. Morgan v. State

    2021 Ark. App. 8 (Ark. Ct. App. 2021)   Cited 1 times

    Jester v. State, 2018 Ark. App. 360, 553 S.W.3d 198.Pettigrew v. State, 2019 Ark. App. 336, at 2. Morgan was charged in the Hot Spring County Circuit Court with aggravated assault, aggravated residential burglary, and first-degree battery, and he pled not guilty on January 8, 2019.

  10. Joyner v. State

    2021 Ark. App. 11 (Ark. Ct. App. 2021)   Cited 2 times
    In Joyner v. State, 2021 Ark.App. 11, we denied counsel's motion to be relieved and ordered rebriefing when counsel failed to address the circuit court's denial of appellant's request during her testimony to send her to rehab rather than to prison.

    The court rejected her request. Counsel also failed to address the circuit court's denial of appellant's request in her testimony to send her to "rehab" rather than to prison. See Pettigrew v. State, 2019 Ark. App. 336. The court denied her request and sentenced her to fifteen years' imprisonment.