From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pettifund v. Camden Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Nov 18, 2016
Civil Action No. 16-6673 (JBS-AMD) (D.N.J. Nov. 18, 2016)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 16-6673 (JBS-AMD)

11-18-2016

AUGUSTO PETTIFUND, Plaintiff, v. CAMDEN COUNTY, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

SIMANDLE, Chief District Judge

Plaintiff Augusto Pettifund seeks to bring this civil action in forma pauperis ("IFP"), without prepayment of fees or security. IFP Application, Docket Entry 1-1.

Plaintiff did not complete the application and left several pages blank. The Court will therefore deny the application without prejudice, and the matter shall be administratively terminated pending submission of the $350 filing fee and $50 administrative fee or a complete IFP application.

An appropriate order follows. November 18 , 2016
Date

s/ Jerome B. Simandle

JEROME B. SIMANDLE

Chief U.S. District Judge


Summaries of

Pettifund v. Camden Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Nov 18, 2016
Civil Action No. 16-6673 (JBS-AMD) (D.N.J. Nov. 18, 2016)
Case details for

Pettifund v. Camden Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:AUGUSTO PETTIFUND, Plaintiff, v. CAMDEN COUNTY, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Date published: Nov 18, 2016

Citations

Civil Action No. 16-6673 (JBS-AMD) (D.N.J. Nov. 18, 2016)