From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pettengill v. Bee Line, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 1, 1933
238 App. Div. 796 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)

Opinion

February, 1933.


Order granting a preference reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and plaintiff's motion for a preference on the ground of destitution denied, without costs. The plaintiff is residing with his wife, who is earning $3,390 a year as a school teacher, while the plaintiff receives a war pension of thirty dollars a month. Plaintiff and his wife reside in a two-family house owned by the wife and from which she receives an income of about forty dollars a month from the tenant as rental of a part thereof. He is not a public charge and it is far from likely that he will become one. In our opinion the granting of plaintiff's motion by the Special Term was not a proper exercise of discretion and the order under review was improvidently made. Lazansky, P.J., Kapper, Carswell, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Pettengill v. Bee Line, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 1, 1933
238 App. Div. 796 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)
Case details for

Pettengill v. Bee Line, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ERNEST W. PETTENGILL, Respondent, v. BEE LINE, INC., and ALFRED EPSTEIN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 1, 1933

Citations

238 App. Div. 796 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)