Opinion
1D21-3478
06-22-2022
Goranco Petrovski, Appellant, v. Lindsey Petrovski, Appellee.
Goranco Petrovski, pro se, Appellant. Autumn Beck Blackledge and Robbie C. Gilpatrick of Autumn Beck Blackledge, PLLC, Pensacola, for Appellee.
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County. J. Scott Duncan, Judge.
Goranco Petrovski, pro se, Appellant.
Autumn Beck Blackledge and Robbie C. Gilpatrick of Autumn Beck Blackledge, PLLC, Pensacola, for Appellee.
Per Curiam.
Former husband seeks review of the trial court's order denying his supplemental petition for modification of timesharing and child support. Our standard of review is whether the trial court's ruling constituted an abuse of discretion. Brown v. Brown, 180 So.3d 1070, 1071, 1072 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015). Having reviewed the hearing transcript, we conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in finding that former husband failed to establish a material and substantial change of circumstances that would warrant the modification of timesharing or child support.
Affirmed.
Lewis, Bilbrey, and Jay, JJ., concur.