From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Petrone v. Comm'r, Soc. Sec. Admin.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON MEDFORD DIVISION
Jun 19, 2014
No. 1:11-cv-484-CL (D. Or. Jun. 19, 2014)

Opinion

No. 1:11-cv-484-CL

06-19-2014

LOUIS PETRONE, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER, Social Security Administration, Defendant.


ORDER

ANNER, District Judge:

Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed Findings and Recommendation, and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Although no objections have been filed, this court reviews legal principles de novo. See Lorin Corp. v Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (8th Cir. 1983).

I agree with Magistrate Judge Clarke that plaintiffs attorney is entitled to the requested fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). Accordingly, I ADOPT the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Clarke.

CONCLUSION

Magistrate Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation (#30) is adopted. Plaintiff's unopposed motion for attorney's fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) (#27) is granted. Counsel is awarded $3,253.00 in fees under § 406(b) and shall refund to plaintiff $1,557.75 in EAJA fees previously awarded.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

__________

OWEN M. PAWNER

U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Petrone v. Comm'r, Soc. Sec. Admin.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON MEDFORD DIVISION
Jun 19, 2014
No. 1:11-cv-484-CL (D. Or. Jun. 19, 2014)
Case details for

Petrone v. Comm'r, Soc. Sec. Admin.

Case Details

Full title:LOUIS PETRONE, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER, Social Security Administration…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON MEDFORD DIVISION

Date published: Jun 19, 2014

Citations

No. 1:11-cv-484-CL (D. Or. Jun. 19, 2014)