Summary
In Petrie v. Railroad Co., 27 S.C. 63, 2 S.E., 837, 838, the plaintiff proposed to ask a witness, who was on the train when the disaster occurred, what she heard the railroad employees say, which upon objection was ruled out; the Court saying: "You can't bind the company by what one of its employees would say after an occurrence.
Summary of this case from Snipes v. Augusta-Aiken Ry. Elec. Corp.Opinion
Argued October 7, 1886
Decided October 26, 1886
Louis Hasbrouck for appellant.
Edwin C. James for respondent.
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.