In Petrie v. Barckley, 47 N.Y. 653, it was held that the seal affixed to a bond is presumptive evidence of full consideration received by the principal, and sufficient to bind the surety.
Summary of this case from GEIN v. LITTLEArgued December 15th, 1872
Decided December, 19th, 1872
J.C. Strong for appellants.
John Ganson for respondent.
GROVER, J., reads opinion for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
In Petrie v. Barckley, 47 N.Y. 653, it was held that the seal affixed to a bond is presumptive evidence of full consideration received by the principal, and sufficient to bind the surety.
Summary of this case from GEIN v. LITTLEFull title:ALEXANDER PETRIE, Respondent, v . WILLIAM BARCKLEY et al., Appellants
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Dec 19, 1872
But the undertaking is sealed. In Petrie v. Barckley, 47 N.Y. 653, it was held that the seal affixed to a…
Cochran v. Taylor( Thomason v. Bescher, 176 N.C. 622; 2 A.L.R. note, p. 631.) It is also frequently stated by the courts that…