From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Petrashov v. Alina Health Headquarters

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Aug 11, 2016
Case No. 15-cv-3061 (WMW/SER) (D. Minn. Aug. 11, 2016)

Summary

adopting Report and Recommendation dismissing personal injury case for lack of federal question because personal injury is not inherently an issue of federal law

Summary of this case from Askew v. McLaughlin

Opinion

Case No. 15-cv-3061 (WMW/SER)

08-11-2016

Semen Petrashov, Plaintiff, v. Alina Health Headquarters, Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AS MODIFIED

This matter is before the Court on the June 14, 2016 Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau. (Dkt. 37.) Magistrate Judge Rau recommended that this Court dismiss this case for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, and, in the alternative, for failure to timely serve Defendant. No objections to the R&R have been filed in the time period permitted.

Oleg Petrashov, who appears to be the Plaintiff's son, filed a letter on June 20, 2016, six days after Magistrate Judge Rau issued the R&R. But Oleg Petrashov has not entered an appearance on Plaintiff's behalf and nothing in the record suggests he is a licensed attorney. Therefore, he is without authority to speak on Plaintiff's behalf in this case. See 28 U.S.C. § 1654 (stating that parties may pursue cases on their own behalf or through counsel); Jones ex rel. Jones v. Corr. Med. Servs., Inc., 401 F.3d 950, 952 (8th Cir. 2005) ("[A] . . . non-attorney may not engage in the practice of law on behalf of others."). --------

The Court agrees with Magistrate Judge Rau's conclusion that it lacks subject-matter jurisdiction over the case and thus must dismiss it without prejudice. Therefore, the Court need not consider whether Plaintiff failed to timely serve Defendant.

Based on the Report and Recommendation of the magistrate judge and all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's June 14, 2016 Report and Recommendation, (Dkt. 37), is ADOPTED only to the extent the R&R recommends dismissing the case for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction;

2. Plaintiff's Complaint, (Dkt. 1), is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated: August 11, 2016

s/Wilhelmina M. Wright

Wilhelmina M. Wright

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Petrashov v. Alina Health Headquarters

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Aug 11, 2016
Case No. 15-cv-3061 (WMW/SER) (D. Minn. Aug. 11, 2016)

adopting Report and Recommendation dismissing personal injury case for lack of federal question because personal injury is not inherently an issue of federal law

Summary of this case from Askew v. McLaughlin
Case details for

Petrashov v. Alina Health Headquarters

Case Details

Full title:Semen Petrashov, Plaintiff, v. Alina Health Headquarters, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Date published: Aug 11, 2016

Citations

Case No. 15-cv-3061 (WMW/SER) (D. Minn. Aug. 11, 2016)

Citing Cases

Askew v. McLaughlin

Such cases are typically brought in state court and rely upon state law. See e.g., Petrashov. v. Alina Health…