Summary
distinguishing Bohnert when the subject testimony was not offered for the witness' belief about another witness' veracity
Summary of this case from Tarachanskaya v. VolodarskyOpinion
September Term, 2002.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
PETITIONS FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Sep 1, 2002
381 Md. 676 (Md. 2002)
Summaries of
PETITIONS FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Sep 1, 2002
381 Md. 676 (Md. 2002)
distinguishing Bohnert when the subject testimony was not offered for the witness' belief about another witness' veracity
Summary of this case from Tarachanskaya v. VolodarskyCase details for
PETITIONS FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
Case Details
Full title:PETITIONS FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
Court:Court of Appeals of Maryland
Date published: Sep 1, 2002
Citations
381 Md. 676 (Md. 2002)
Citing Cases
Tetso v. State
More recently, in Riggins v. State, 155 Md.App. 181, 186–87, 843 A.2d 115,cert. denied,381 Md. 676, 851 A.2d…
Tarachanskaya v. VolodarskyIn Ware v. State, 360 Md. 650, 679, 759 A.2d 764 (2000), the Court of Appeals reiterated that "[w]hether a…