concluding that trial court did not err in awarding an amount roughly equivalent to what plaintiff would have received under the employment agreement
Summary of this case from Sharma v. Providence Health & Services-OregonApril 18, 1989.
concluding that trial court did not err in awarding an amount roughly equivalent to what plaintiff would have received under the employment agreement
Summary of this case from Sharma v. Providence Health & Services-Oregonobserving that the trial court could properly conclude that there was insufficient evidence of a father's oral contract to make a will, where the plaintiff and father never reached an agreement as to how plaintiff was to obtain his 50 percent interest in the father's business
Summary of this case from In re SchwindtFull title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ALLOWED AND DENIED
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Apr 18, 1989
"(1) that another group has been granted a `privilege' or `immunity' which [plaintiff's] group has not been…
Ward v. RomigPlaintiff appeals and contends that the statute violates Article I, section 20, of the Oregon Constitution,…