reversing suppression of fruits of warranted search in a prosecution for contributing to the sexual delinquency of a minor where the warrant issued approximately 90 days after the purported conduct; noting that condoms, which were one of the items identified in the warrant, “are not contraband, but rather articles the continued possession of which is not illegal or unlikely”
Summary of this case from State v. UlizziJanuary 9, 1979.
reversing suppression of fruits of warranted search in a prosecution for contributing to the sexual delinquency of a minor where the warrant issued approximately 90 days after the purported conduct; noting that condoms, which were one of the items identified in the warrant, “are not contraband, but rather articles the continued possession of which is not illegal or unlikely”
Summary of this case from State v. UlizziFull title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ALLOWED AND DENIED
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Jan 9, 1979
Our review of the second issue would be for substantial evidence to support the city's determination of the…
Taylor v. Employment DivisionArgued July 21, 1978. Affirmed September 6, reconsideration denied October 31, 1978, petition for review…