rejecting argument that statutory claims against former employer sounded in contract rather than tort merely because they arose generally out of employment contract
Summary of this case from Jenkins v. Portland Hous. Auth., Corp.March 21, 1989.
rejecting argument that statutory claims against former employer sounded in contract rather than tort merely because they arose generally out of employment contract
Summary of this case from Jenkins v. Portland Hous. Auth., Corp.allowing a marketability discount but holding a minority discount is not appropriate
Summary of this case from Rigel Corp. v. Cutchallreviewing the trial court’s motion to strike for failure to state a defense
Summary of this case from Gardner v. Or. Health Scis. Univ.examining the three approaches and noting that all three must be considered to determine the fair price of shares held by a dissenting minority shareholder
Summary of this case from In re Gaydiscussing those factors in determining "fair value" under Oregon's statutes allowing a dissenting shareholder of a close corporation to obtain payment for shares
Summary of this case from Jeffries v. MillsFull title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ALLOWED AND DENIED
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Mar 21, 1989
A marketability discount "reflects the illiquidity of the shares of a closely held corporation." Columbia…
Hill v. GoldWe are aware of no argument that the general purposes served by the shareholder protection provisions of that…