Summary
finding no statute authorizing forfeiture as a condition of probation
Summary of this case from State v. MillerOpinion
April 4, 1989.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Petitions for Review Allowed and Denied
Oregon Supreme Court
Apr 4, 1989
307 Or. 611 (Or. 1989)
Summaries of
Petitions for Review Allowed and Denied
Oregon Supreme Court
Apr 4, 1989
307 Or. 611 (Or. 1989)
finding no statute authorizing forfeiture as a condition of probation
Summary of this case from State v. Millerfinding no statute authorizing forfeiture as a condition of probation
Summary of this case from State v. Olsonreasoning that, in a proceeding under ORS 183.400, a rule must be invalidated "when the agency's power to act depends on certain prerequisites and the record affirmatively shows that the agency did not comply with those prerequisites"
Summary of this case from Waterwatch v. Water Resources CommissionCase details for
Petitions for Review Allowed and Denied
Case Details
Full title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ALLOWED AND DENIED
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Apr 4, 1989
Citations
307 Or. 611 (Or. 1989)
Citing Cases
Forrester and Forrester
Sheldon, 82 Or App at 624. We came to a similar conclusion in Wyllie and Wyllie, 95 Or. App. 109, 767 P.2d…
Wyllie and WyllieArgued and submitted April 20, 1988Reversed and remanded for reconsideration of fine for contempt; otherwise…