Summary
holding that some kinds of bonuses constitute "wages"
Summary of this case from Miller v. C. C. Meisel Co.Opinion
September 17, 1985.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Petitions for Review Allowed and Denied
Oregon Supreme Court
Sep 17, 1985
300 Or. 64 (Or. 1985)
Summaries of
Petitions for Review Allowed and Denied
Oregon Supreme Court
Sep 17, 1985
300 Or. 64 (Or. 1985)
holding that some kinds of bonuses constitute "wages"
Summary of this case from Miller v. C. C. Meisel Co.applying analogous contractual principles under Oregon law and holding that executive was entitled to unpaid bonus, where amount of bonus pool could be determined by arithmetical calculation, and although allocation of pool to individual employees was left to discretion of executive committee, exercise of discretion was not unlimited but was subject to good faith requirement
Summary of this case from Focus Management Group USA, Inc. v. Kingapplying analogous contractual principles under Oregon law and holding that executive was entitled to unpaid bonus, where amount of bonus pool could be determined by arithmetical calculation, and although allocation of pool to individual employees was left to discretion of executive committee, exercise of discretion was not unlimited but was subject to good faith requirement
Summary of this case from CIB Marine Capital, LLC v. Herman (In re Herman)Case details for
Petitions for Review Allowed and Denied
Case Details
Full title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ALLOWED AND DENIED
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Sep 17, 1985
Citations
300 Or. 64 (Or. 1985)
Citing Cases
State v. Crenshaw
We have previously noted the apparent inconsistency between those cases, concluding that they "suggest that a…
Wyss v. InskeepArgued and submitted April 5, 1985 Reversed and remanded with instructions May 22, 1985 Reconsideration…