holding that applying current substantive law would violate the ex post facto clauses of the Oregon and federal constitutions if doing so leads to an increased term of incarceration
Summary of this case from Edwards v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision1992.
holding that applying current substantive law would violate the ex post facto clauses of the Oregon and federal constitutions if doing so leads to an increased term of incarceration
Summary of this case from Edwards v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervisionholding that error in imposing sentence of 15 to 18 months on one count was harmless given that the sentence was imposed concurrently to a 58-month sentence for another count, because the error could not affect the defendant's actual period of imprisonment
Summary of this case from State v. Gutierrezholding that sentencing error involving multiple convictions was not harmless, despite the fact that the sentences were concurrent, because it was impossible to predict the impact that the error might have on a subsequent parole decision
Summary of this case from Mageske v. Board of Paroleconcluding that substantial evidence supported the board's determination that the claimant's employment was the major contributing cause of his multiple chemical sensitivities
Summary of this case from Kennedy v. E.A.P.Taffirming despite conceded sentencing error where error did not affect period of imprisonment and did not result in any adverse consequences
Summary of this case from State v. Jonesnoting that "[t]he court has authority to extend probation without finding a violation"
Summary of this case from State v. Berglundrelying on Jim/White for that proposition
Summary of this case from State v. Spearssentencing error did not require remedial action when it could not affect actual term of imprisonment
Summary of this case from State v. DavesFull title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Jan 1, 1992
Instead, the trial court ranked the convictions in grid block H. Defendant is correct that the trial court…
Flemming v. Oregon Bd. of ParoleThus, a prisoner who receives the maximum reduction at the time of his or her first review may nevertheless…