Summary
applying that standard to review of denials of motions for directed verdict and to dismiss following trial on the merits
Summary of this case from Shoup v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Opinion
1998.
applying that standard to review of denials of motions for directed verdict and to dismiss following trial on the merits
Summary of this case from Shoup v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.1998.
applying that standard to review of denials of motions for directed verdict and to dismiss following trial on the merits
Summary of this case from Shoup v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Full title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Jan 1, 1998
Defendant argued that, even under principles of general foreseeability, section 315 precludes defendant's…
Mariah Investments, Ltd. v. McCabeId. In Rosboro Lumber Co. v. Apsel, 144 Or. App. 298, 926 P.2d 329 (1996), adhered to on recons 146 Or. App.…