Summary
applying Van Den Bron test to slip-and-fall case involving a blueberry on the floor of a grocery store
Summary of this case from Hinchman v. UC Market, LLCOpinion
October 2, 1990.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Petitions for Review
Oregon Supreme Court
Oct 2, 1990
310 Or. 422 (Or. 1990)
Summaries of
Petitions for Review
Oregon Supreme Court
Oct 2, 1990
310 Or. 422 (Or. 1990)
applying Van Den Bron test to slip-and-fall case involving a blueberry on the floor of a grocery store
Summary of this case from Hinchman v. UC Market, LLCaddressing the plaintiff's claim that the defendant was negligent for not wrapping blueberry containers in cellophane to prevent slip-inducing blueberry from dropping to the floor, and declining to adopt the theory that “an occupier of premises who places foreign objects where they might fall on the floor is liable, because it should have known of the risk that an object would be on the floor”
Summary of this case from Hagler v. Coastal Farm Holdings, Inc.Case details for
Petitions for Review
Case Details
Full title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Oct 2, 1990
Citations
310 Or. 422 (Or. 1990)
Citing Cases
Teague v. Palmateer
On direct appeal in 1990, this court affirmed petitioner's conviction without opinion, and the Oregon Supreme…
Stewart v. Kids Incorporated of DallasAnd, as we also observed in McPherson, “for purposes of determining the scope of duties in ‘special…