Summary
interpreting James v. SAIF, supra; work must be "the major contributing cause"
Summary of this case from Maddox v. SaifOpinion
March 30, 1982.
interpreting James v. SAIF, supra; work must be "the major contributing cause"
Summary of this case from Maddox v. SaifMarch 30, 1982.
interpreting James v. SAIF, supra; work must be "the major contributing cause"
Summary of this case from Maddox v. SaifFull title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Mar 30, 1982
And in all of the cases (except Young), the basis of the employer's belief was the same: Although…
Saif v. LuhrsShortly thereafter, Dr. Long diagnosed carpal tunnel syndrome in claimant's left wrist, and performed surgery…