Summary
holding that, for purposes of reimbursement under ORS 757.805, the word "incurred" refers to being subjected to costs and expenses as well as being liable for them
Summary of this case from State v. Romero-NavarroOpinion
1998.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Petitions for Review
Oregon Supreme Court
Jan 1, 1998
327 Or. 432 (Or. 1998)
Summaries of
Petitions for Review
Oregon Supreme Court
Jan 1, 1998
327 Or. 432 (Or. 1998)
holding that, for purposes of reimbursement under ORS 757.805, the word "incurred" refers to being subjected to costs and expenses as well as being liable for them
Summary of this case from State v. Romero-Navarrogranting directed verdict for defendant where second Chesterman requirement was not present
Summary of this case from Miller v. Salem Merchant Patrol, Inc.Case details for
Petitions for Review
Case Details
Full title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Jan 1, 1998
Citations
327 Or. 432 (Or. 1998)
Citing Cases
State v. Presley
For these purposes, a stop of a driver is a stop of a passenger, and the limitations on the officer's…
White v. Jubitz Corp.The common meaning of "incur," as defined in Webster's and as we have previously recognized, is to "become…