Summary
concluding that prior bad act evidence that tended only to prove that "once a child abuser always a child abuser" was not relevant for any noncharacter purpose
Summary of this case from State v. CarreiroOpinion
1997.
concluding that prior bad act evidence that tended only to prove that "once a child abuser always a child abuser" was not relevant for any noncharacter purpose
Summary of this case from State v. Carreiro1997.
concluding that prior bad act evidence that tended only to prove that "once a child abuser always a child abuser" was not relevant for any noncharacter purpose
Summary of this case from State v. CarreiroFull title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Jan 1, 1997
We note that, because the trial court refused to award attorney fees, defendants were not required to serve…
Stranahan v. Fred Meyer, Inc.The evidence in question was relevant impeachment evidence.See, e.g., State v. Burgess, 145 Or. App. 334,…