Summary
addressing only Fifth Amendment self-incrimination argument because argument under Article I, section 12, of Oregon Constitution was not preserved
Summary of this case from Empire Wholesale Lumber Co. v. MeyersOpinion
May 20, 2003
addressing only Fifth Amendment self-incrimination argument because argument under Article I, section 12, of Oregon Constitution was not preserved
Summary of this case from Empire Wholesale Lumber Co. v. MeyersMay 20, 2003
addressing only Fifth Amendment self-incrimination argument because argument under Article I, section 12, of Oregon Constitution was not preserved
Summary of this case from Empire Wholesale Lumber Co. v. MeyersFull title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: May 20, 2003
If the officer entered the car in order to conduct a criminal investigation, the entrance could not be deemed…
M. A. D. v. M. A. DIt is correct, of course, that Article I, section 9, provides protection only against unreasonable searches,…