Summary
concluding that a supporting memorandum is not a "motion" for purposes of the ORCP
Summary of this case from Adams v. AdamsOpinion
April 11, 2000
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Petitions for Review
Oregon Supreme Court
Apr 11, 2000
330 Or. 252 (Or. 2000)
Summaries of
Petitions for Review
Oregon Supreme Court
Apr 11, 2000
330 Or. 252 (Or. 2000)
concluding that a supporting memorandum is not a "motion" for purposes of the ORCP
Summary of this case from Adams v. Adamsgranting the defendant's motion to supplement the appellate record to reflect the disposition of motion made under ORS 138.083
Summary of this case from State v. Jennichesstating principle in relation to prevailing defendants' work on both successful and unsuccessful affirmative defenses
Summary of this case from Fadel v. El-Tobgystating principle in relation to prevailing defendants' work on both successful and unsuccessful affirmative defenses
Summary of this case from Fadel v. El-Tobgydiscussing the differences between Oregon and federal law regarding the predominance of common questions of law and fact as prerequisites for class certification
Summary of this case from Strawn v. Farmers Insu. Co.noting "a general policy disfavoring interlocutory appeals"
Summary of this case from Pearson v. Philip Morris, Inc.collecting definitions
Summary of this case from Wilson v. Smurfit Newsprint Corp.alleging the right to attorney fees in summary judgment memorandum, rather than in motion, violates ORCP 68 C(b) but error is excused by ORCP 12 B
Summary of this case from Matter of the Marriage of Gintheraccruing penalties under ORS 650.150 are "wages"
Summary of this case from Vento v. Versatile Logic Systems Corp.Case details for
Petitions for Review
Case Details
Full title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Apr 11, 2000
Citations
330 Or. 252 (Or. 2000)
6 P.3d 518
Citing Cases
Wilson v. Smurfit Newsprint Corp.
Severance pay is "wages" for purposes of ORS chapter 652. See Ore. Motor Ass'n, 248 Or at 136 ("wages" means…
Young v. State of OregonWe stated: "In Wyatt [ v. Body Imaging, P.C., 163 Or App 526, 531-32, 989 P2d 36 (1999), rev den, 330 Or…