Summary
addressing preemption first because it "implicates [the court's] jurisdiction"
Summary of this case from Wolf v. Central Oregon Pacific RailroadOpinion
1995.
addressing preemption first because it "implicates [the court's] jurisdiction"
Summary of this case from Wolf v. Central Oregon Pacific Railroad1995.
addressing preemption first because it "implicates [the court's] jurisdiction"
Summary of this case from Wolf v. Central Oregon Pacific Railroadexplaining that ORS 135.407 is illustrative, not exclusive
Summary of this case from State v. Youngrefusing to violate Federal Aviation Administration safety regulations
Summary of this case from Babick v. Oregon Arena Corp.Full title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Jan 1, 1995
Beyond that, ORS 138.222(2)(d) "allow[s] review of sentences unless they were `stipulated sentences' as…
Blackledge v. MorrowThere is no dispute that petitioner stipulated to the 65-month sentence at issue here. See State v. Kephart,…