From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Petitions for Review

Oregon Supreme Court
Dec 18, 2001
333 Or. 162 (Or. 2001)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

observing that “[t]his requirement serves the purpose of causing the parties to frame their arguments appropriately” and “helps to identify any differences that the parties may have regarding the proper scope of review”

Summary of this case from Weldon v. Bd. of Licensed Prof'l Counselors
See 5 Summaries

Opinion

December 11, 2001

December 18, 2001 Hamel, George F. v. Johnson (A100349) (S48835) ( 173 Or. App. 448) State v. Bates, Philip Medley (A107416) (S48728) ( 175 Or. App. 291) State v. Bracken, Jeremy Owen (A104396) (S48817) ( 174 Or. App. 294) State v. Butterfield, Patricia Ann (A106088) (S48709) ( 174 Or. App. 565) State v. Davis, Eddie Lee (A104488) (S48680) ( 172 Or. App. 765) State v. Lovell, Michael Dale (A107523) (S48713) ( 175 Or. App. 291) State v. Mogstad, Jason Alan (A109621) (S48910) ( 176 Or. App. 360) State v. Price, Bradley C. (A106714) (S48884) ( 174 Or. App. 565) State v. Schwartz, Randal Lee (A91702) (S48937) ( 173 Or. App. 301) State v. Stokke, Troy Daniel (A105834) (S48974) ( 175 Or. App. 555) State v. Warren, Keoni (A106959) (S48968) ( 176 Or. App. 649)

Summaries of

Petitions for Review

Oregon Supreme Court
Dec 18, 2001
333 Or. 162 (Or. 2001)

observing that “[t]his requirement serves the purpose of causing the parties to frame their arguments appropriately” and “helps to identify any differences that the parties may have regarding the proper scope of review”

Summary of this case from Weldon v. Bd. of Licensed Prof'l Counselors

addressing admissibility of evidence to establish "motive" as distinct from "intent" under OEC 404

Summary of this case from State v. Borck

explaining on remand from Supreme Court that, if, at the time it issued the challenged order, the board lacked a valid reason to postpone the petitioner's parole release date, then it would have been obligated to release him on parole at that time and "there would have been no occasion for a second order"

Summary of this case from Alexander v. Board of Parole

noting that "`parole is in the nature of a grant of partial liberty or a lessening of restrictions to a convicted prisoner,'" but that "statutory entitlement to parole may, under some circumstances, create a liberty interest that is cognizable for purposes of" due process

Summary of this case from Davis v. Board of Parole

examining circumstances to determine whether unlawful search led police to focus on or interview the defendant

Summary of this case from State v. Bryant
Case details for

Petitions for Review

Case Details

Full title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW

Court:Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: Dec 18, 2001

Citations

333 Or. 162 (Or. 2001)

Citing Cases

Colby v. Thompson

Unless otherwise noted, references in this opinion to ORS 144.226 and ORS 144.228 are to the 1995 versions of…

Weldon v. Bd. of Licensed Prof'l Counselors

As we have previously cautioned, the requirement to identify the standard of review for an assigned error is…

25 Citing Cases