upholding right of first refusal that stated that, "[i]f Lessor should decide to sell said real property * * *, Lessees shall have the first right to refuse the purchase of the property" (omission in Dennis ; internal quotation marks omitted)
Summary of this case from Macadam Bay Homeowners Ass'n v. SoysterOctober 13, 1981.
upholding right of first refusal that stated that, "[i]f Lessor should decide to sell said real property * * *, Lessees shall have the first right to refuse the purchase of the property" (omission in Dennis ; internal quotation marks omitted)
Summary of this case from Macadam Bay Homeowners Ass'n v. Soysterdistinguishing Mepham on the basis that the affidavit contained additional relevant facts, including two recent occasions on which the affiant was present when the defendant was arrested for crimes involving controlled substances
Summary of this case from State v. Huffdescribing rational basis test as a "minimum rationality" standard
Summary of this case from Morsman v. City of Madrasconstruing the corresponding requirement under former ORS 20.220
Summary of this case from B D Investment Corp. v. PetticordFull title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Oct 13, 1981
The county contends that ERB has exclusive jurisdiction of litigation concerning public sector labor…
State v. ShortShe argues that the trial court erred in allowing the state to introduce the evidence that her refusal would…