From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Petitions for Review

Oregon Supreme Court
Jan 1, 1993
317 Or. 272 (Or. 1993)

Summary

holding that the installation of a defective product is not a sale of a product subject to strict liability

Summary of this case from Brown v. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC

Opinion

1993.


Summaries of

Petitions for Review

Oregon Supreme Court
Jan 1, 1993
317 Or. 272 (Or. 1993)

holding that the installation of a defective product is not a sale of a product subject to strict liability

Summary of this case from Brown v. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC

concluding that charges of second-degree sodomy, first-degree sexual abuse, and endangering the welfare of a minor were properly joined on the basis of their similar character because "[a]ll three indictments charged defendant with sexual conduct with male children he had brought to his home for purposes of adoption"

Summary of this case from State v. Garrett

upholding exclusion of impeachment evidence offered by defendant because, “[t]o be used for impeachment, a contradictory statement must be ‘reasonably precise’ and not merely a ‘recitation of opinion and character’ ”

Summary of this case from State v. Stapp

approving the use of the emergency aid doctrine where the police officer was unable to rouse a woman he could see lying on a couch inside a house he knew was occupied by unattended children

Summary of this case from State v. Burdick

noting that according to then-current version of ORS 742.542, a plaintiff could "stack" PIP and uninsured motorist benefits but not PIP and underinsured motorist benefits

Summary of this case from Gaucin v. Farmers Ins. Co.

using roadway easement for yard and garden was hostile rather than permissive

Summary of this case from Faulcorner v. Williams
Case details for

Petitions for Review

Case Details

Full title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW

Court:Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: Jan 1, 1993

Citations

317 Or. 272 (Or. 1993)

Citing Cases

State v. Goodall

In establishing the reasonableness of the detectives' actions, the focus is on the facts present at the time…

Cameron v. Norco Contract Service

The Board agreed with insurer. It held that ORS 656.262(4)(b) provides "a mechanism whereby an insurer or…