From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Petitions for Review

Oregon Supreme Court
May 3, 2000
330 Or. 331 (Or. 2000)

Summary

holding that it was not error for trial court to give jury technically correct instruction on vicarious liability—one that was unlikely to have created an erroneous perception of the law—even though instruction was not a "model of clarity" and was a simple "cut-and-paste melding" of language pulled from multiple decisions; noting that instruction "exemplifie[d] the caveat that ‘[a]n instruction that accurately quotes or faithfully paraphrases an appellate decision is not necessarily beyond reproach.’ Rogers v. Meridian Park Hospital , 307 Or. 612, 616, 7 P.2d 929" (first and third brackets added).

Summary of this case from Torres v. Persson

Opinion

May 3, 2000


Summaries of

Petitions for Review

Oregon Supreme Court
May 3, 2000
330 Or. 331 (Or. 2000)

holding that it was not error for trial court to give jury technically correct instruction on vicarious liability—one that was unlikely to have created an erroneous perception of the law—even though instruction was not a "model of clarity" and was a simple "cut-and-paste melding" of language pulled from multiple decisions; noting that instruction "exemplifie[d] the caveat that ‘[a]n instruction that accurately quotes or faithfully paraphrases an appellate decision is not necessarily beyond reproach.’ Rogers v. Meridian Park Hospital , 307 Or. 612, 616, 7 P.2d 929" (first and third brackets added).

Summary of this case from Torres v. Persson

holding that under former ORS 475.992, renumbered as ORS 475.752, which prohibited knowing possession of a "controlled substance," "the state is not required to prove a defendant’s knowledge of the particular type of controlled substance possessed"

Summary of this case from State v. Harper

addressing foundation of law of the case doctrine

Summary of this case from Or. Educ. Ass'n v. Or. Taxpayers United

recounting evolution of case law

Summary of this case from State v. Andrews
Case details for

Petitions for Review

Case Details

Full title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW

Court:Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: May 3, 2000

Citations

330 Or. 331 (Or. 2000)
6 P.3d 1100

Citing Cases

Hayward v. Belleque

However, in our view, under the Supreme Court's analysis, by making victim impact evidence available during…

Vokoun v. City of Lake Oswego

According to plaintiffs, the city cannot be heard to complain about the matter now. We review jury…