From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Petitions for Review

Oregon Supreme Court
Jul 3, 2001
332 Or. 305 (Or. 2001)

Summary

holding that a party's request for a jury instruction invites error resulting from that instruction

Summary of this case from State v. Swartz

Opinion

June 26, 2001

June 3, 2001

June 26, 2001

July 3, 2001


Summaries of

Petitions for Review

Oregon Supreme Court
Jul 3, 2001
332 Or. 305 (Or. 2001)

holding that a party's request for a jury instruction invites error resulting from that instruction

Summary of this case from State v. Swartz

holding that acceptance of a combined condition is not an outright acceptance of a preexisting condition that has combined with a work-related injury or condition

Summary of this case from Columbia Forest Products v. Woolner

denying modification of child support based on a reduction in the child's college financial aid award, because the record of the prior support proceeding prevented us from concluding that the reduction was unanticipated

Summary of this case from In re Marriage of Williams

declining to consider the possible effects of taxation in dividing property where “there [was] no evidence in record of what the tax consequences would be” if the property was sold

Summary of this case from In re Johnson

reasoning that a writ of habeas corpus is available only if no other adequate remedy exists

Summary of this case from Adams v. Clements

discussing standards for valid waiver in context of purported oral waiver

Summary of this case from State v. Riggins
Case details for

Petitions for Review

Case Details

Full title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW

Court:Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: Jul 3, 2001

Citations

332 Or. 305 (Or. 2001)

Citing Cases

State v. Clardy

Id. at 133-34, 831 P.2d 666. "Where the preferred colloquy did not occur on the record, or, alternatively,…

Bidwell v. Baker

According to plaintiff, on October 3, 2000, the parties reached an oral agreement settling the disputed…