concluding that "a two-inch-long, half-inch-wide divot [in the victim’s] left forehead * * * visible from 40 feet away" constituted a "serious and protracted disfigurement and, thus, serious physical injury within the meaning of ORS 161.015"
Summary of this case from State v. DrewNovember 5, 2003
concluding that "a two-inch-long, half-inch-wide divot [in the victim’s] left forehead * * * visible from 40 feet away" constituted a "serious and protracted disfigurement and, thus, serious physical injury within the meaning of ORS 161.015"
Summary of this case from State v. Drewrejecting the defendant's Sixth Amendment speedy trial contention because he never asserted his rights to a speedy trial
Summary of this case from State v. Lewisexplaining that the "scar itself was demonstrative evidence that conveyed a ‘firsthand sense impression to the trier of fact’ "
Summary of this case from State v. FieldsFull title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Nov 5, 2003
The "trial court's description of what it observed, while not evidence, is explanatory regarding the import…
In the Matter of Compensation of LewisFiled: April 7, 2004. On remand from the Oregon Supreme Court, Lewis v. CIGNA Ins Co., 336 Or. 125, 79 P.3d…