holding that we lacked jurisdiction to consider an amended appeal from an amended new trial order because the notice of appeal from the original new trial order was filed before the amended order was entered; thus, the trial court did not have jurisdiction to enter the amended order and that order never became final and appealable
Summary of this case from Haimovitz v. Haimovitz1998.
holding that we lacked jurisdiction to consider an amended appeal from an amended new trial order because the notice of appeal from the original new trial order was filed before the amended order was entered; thus, the trial court did not have jurisdiction to enter the amended order and that order never became final and appealable
Summary of this case from Haimovitz v. Haimovitzdiscussing difference between confrontation and compulsory process rights
Summary of this case from State v. CartwrightFull title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Jan 1, 1998
Here, he was not restricted in the scope of his cross-examination of witnesses but, rather, was restricted in…
Tri-County Center Trust v. MartinDefendants contend that the adjoining property should have been considered in making the division by…